100kwinner

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/1...0124-index.html

The link leads to a 67 page document detailing a lot about the company and the systems used for gaming and security.

Does any of this prove or disprove that they are on the level?

MrStiv

Uhhh, isn't this stuff like nearly three years old?

Jetset

Someone else published that link earlier this year, too and it was pointed out that Starnet (now World Gaming) had seen at least two changes of management and a major restructuring in the interim, and has paid up for the proved previous transgressions in a plea bargain.

They've moved to London and the latest CEO seems to be tackling their problems and opportunities in a professional way judging by the business press and their media releases.

100kwinner

Sorry to be posting the link again, I never saw the original posting.

But basically I was referring to some of the details talked about concerning the software and the servers. I don't understand all the technical jargon and I was hoping that someone may know if it means that the systems are really random (or at least as close to random as it is possible to get).

Basically does it prove that the servers are not cheating on the games? There are some fancy terms used that may just be the company blowing hot air and I was unsure how to take it.

ZeeGambler

100k ---

To learn all about it and find all the answers visit these links:
http://www.StarnetIsland.com
http://www.StarnetSucks.com
http://www.GamblingMagazine.com

Enjoy.

TheDude

Zee, i would have to say that those sites are quite biased, as the one URL sums up the theme, StarnetSucks.com. This is the opinion of Claude Levy, an ex Starnet licenccee. I would take these sites with a grain of salt.

I'm not saying Starnet is perfect by any means, just be sure your source for information isn't so biased. A Sony representative isn't going to tell you about how great the new Pioneer stuff is.

Shaun

grantt

Good points Dude some people don't get it ZZZZZZZ.